Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15630476›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2005

A gradual process of recombination restriction in the evolutionary history of the sex chromosomes in dioecious plants.

Michael Nicolas, Gabriel Marais, Vladka Hykelova, Bohuslav Janousek, Valérie Laporte, Boris Vyskot, Dominique Mouchiroud, Ioan Negrutiu, Deborah Charlesworth, Françoise Monéger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TheScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterogeneous Evolution of Sex Chromosomes in the Torrent Frog GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. The evolution of huge Y chromosomes inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The timing of genetic degeneration of sex chromosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael NicolasLaboratoire de Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, ENS Lyon, France.
Gabriel Marais
Vladka Hykelova
Bohuslav Janousek
Valérie Laporte
Boris Vyskot
Dominique Mouchiroud
Ioan Negrutiu
Deborah Charlesworth
Françoise Monéger
Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes · FRUniversity of Edinburgh · GBÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FRCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics · CZLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To help understand the evolution of suppressed recombination between sex chromosomes, and its consequences for evolution of the sequences of Y-linked genes, we have studied four X-Y gene pairs, including one gene not previously characterized, in plants in a group of closely related dioecious species of Silene which have an X-Y sex-determining system (S. latifolia, S. dioica, and S. diclinis). We used the X-linked copies to build a genetic map of the X chromosomes, with a marker in the pseudoautosomal region (PAR) to orient the map. The map covers a large part of the X chromosomes--at least 50 centimorgans. Except for a recent rearrangement in S. dioica, the gene order is the same in the X chromosomes of all three species. Silent site divergence between the DNA sequences of the X and Y copies of the different genes increases with the genes' distances from the PAR, suggesting progressive restriction of recombination between the X and Y chromosomes. This was confirmed by phylogenetic analyses of the four genes, which also revealed that the least-diverged X-Y pair could have ceased recombining independently in the dioecious species after their split. Analysis of amino acid replacements vs. synonymous changes showed that, with one possible exception, the Y-linked copies appear to be functional in all three species, but there are nevertheless some signs of degenerative processes affecting the genes that have been Y-linked for the longest times. Although the X-Y system evolved quite recently in Silene (less than 10 million years ago) compared to mammals (about 320 million years ago), our results suggest that similar processes have been at work in the evolution of sex chromosomes in plants and mammals, and shed some light on the molecular mechanisms suppressing recombination between X and Y chromosomes.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantEvolution, MolecularAnimalsChromosome MappingDNA, ComplementaryGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASex ChromosomesSileneX ChromosomeY ChromosomeDNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID15630476
PMCPMC536007
OpenAlexW2043424267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.