Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15626761›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

The effects of upstream DNA on open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Caroline A Davis, Michael W Capp, M Thomas Record, Ruth M Saecker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. One-step DNA melting in the RNA polymerase cleft opens the initiation bubble to form an unstable open complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline A DavisDepartment of Biochemistry and Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Michael W Capp
M Thomas Record
Ruth M Saecker
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

THERMODYNAMICS &MECHANISMS OF PROTEIN/DNA INTERACTIONSR37GM023467 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RECORD, M. THOMAS · 1997 to 2006
$2.9M
THERMODYNAMICS &MECHANISMS OF PROTEIN-DNA INTERACTIONSR01GM023467 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RECORD, M. THOMAS · 1985 to 2011
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM23467NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM023467NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM023467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding of activators to upstream DNA sequences regulates transcription initiation by affecting the stability of the initial RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter complex and/or the rate of subsequent conformational changes required to form the open complex (RP(O)). Here we observe that the presence of nonspecific upstream DNA profoundly affects an early step in formation of the transcription bubble. Kinetic studies with the lambdaP(R) promoter and Escherichia coli RNAP reveal that the presence of DNA upstream of base pair -47 greatly increases the rate of forming RP(O), without significantly affecting its rate of dissociation. We find that this increase is largely due to an acceleration of the rate-limiting step (isomerization) in RP(O) formation, a step that occurs after polymerase binds. Footprinting experiments reveal striking structural differences downstream of the transcription start site (+1) in the first kinetically significant intermediate when upstream DNA is present. On the template strand, the DNase I downstream boundary of this early intermediate is +20 when upstream DNA is present but is shortened by approximately two helical turns when upstream DNA beyond -47 is removed. KMnO(4) footprinting reveals an identical initiation bubble (-11 to +2), but unusual reactivity of template strand upstream cytosines (-12, -14, and -15) on the truncated promoter. Based on this work, we propose that early wrapping interactions between upstream DNA and the polymerase exterior strongly affect the events that control entry and subsequent unwinding of the DNA start site in the jaws of polymerase.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticDNADNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli ProteinsKineticsPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription Initiation SiteDNADNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15626761
PMCPMC544287
OpenAlexW2051109168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.