Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15623868›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2005

Life-years gained from modern cardiological treatments and population risk factor changes in England and Wales, 1981-2000.

Belgin Unal, Julia A Critchley, Dogan Fidan, Simon Capewell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Changes in lifestyle after hypertension diagnosis in Canada.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gaps and Directions in Addressing Non-Communicable and Chronic Diseases in China: A Policy Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Belgin UnalDepartment of Public Health, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey. belgin.unal@deu.edu.tr
Julia A Critchley
Dogan Fidan
Simon Capewell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe estimated life-years gained from cardiological treatments and cardiovascular risk factor changes in England and Wales between 1981 and 2000.

methodsWe used the IMPACT model to integrate data on the number of coronary heart disease patients, treatment uptake and effectiveness, risk factor trends, and median survival in coronary heart disease patients.

resultsCompared with 1981, there were 68230 fewer coronary deaths in 2000. Approximately 925415 life-years were gained among people aged 25-84 years (range: 745 195-1 138 655). Cardiological treatments for patients accounted for approximately 194145 life-years gained (range: 142505-259225), and population risk factor changes accounted for approximately 731270 life-years gained (range; 602695-879430).

conclusionsModest reductions in major risk factors led to gains in life-years 4 times higher than did cardiological treatments. Effective policies to promote healthy diets and physical activity might achieve even greater gains.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionEnglandFemaleHumansHypertensionLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedObesityRisk FactorsSex DistributionSmoking

Identifiers

PMID15623868
PMCPMC1449860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.