ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2005
[Vascular surgery in the elderly].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Innovative geriatric concepts for vascular medicine and vascular surgery].Gefasschirurgie : Zeitschrift fur vaskulare und endovaskulare Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschen und der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie unter Mitarbeit der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie · 2021Review
- An analysis of vascular surgery in elderly patients to determine whether age affects treatment strategy.Irish journal of medical science · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of vascular disease among the elderly population is high (approximately 20%). The morbidity and mortality of many vascular operations show no differences between the fit elderly and younger patients. A major problem is that the elderly are often not diagnosed and treated early enough to prevent emergency operations, which carry a much higher mortality. Many new surgical techniques, especially endovascular interventions, have made vascular surgery less invasive. These advances have increased the potential of life saving and prolonging vascular surgery that can be offered to all patients regardless of age. Risk-benefit analysis, especially in elderly patients, is a cornerstone of proper patient selection. The main goal of vascular surgery in the elderly is preservation of quality of life and independence. Surgery of a ruptured aneurysm is a life saving exception. Indications for treatment in the elderly remains an individual decision making process. Advanced age should not be considered as a limitation or contraindication for carotid, aneurysm and bypass surgery. Age is not a disease, it is just a chapter of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.