Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15617261›Full record

ReviewJournal of fluorescence2004

Fluorescence glucose detection: advances toward the ideal in vivo biosensor.

Elizabeth A Moschou, Bethel V Sharma, Sapna K Deo, Sylvia Daunert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fluorescence, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fluorescence-Detected Mid-Infrared Photothermal Microscopy.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Noninvasive glucose detection in exhaled breath condensate.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Rational Design of Ni(OH)Nanoscale research letters · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Light-Guiding Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced functional materials · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A MoschouDepartment of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Bethel V Sharma
Sapna K Deo
Sylvia Daunert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of glucose monitoring for in vivo as well as for ex vivo applications has driven a vast number of scientific groups to pursue the development of an advanced glucose sensor. Such a sensor must be robust, versatile, and capable of the long-term, accurate and reproducible detection of glucose levels in various testing media. Among the different configurations and signal transduction mechanisms used, fluorescence-based glucose sensors constitute a growing class of glucose sensors represented by an increasing number of significant contributions to the field over the last few years. This manuscript reviews the progress in the development of fluorescence based glucose sensors resulting from the advances in the design of new receptor systems for glucose recognition and the utilization of new fluorescence transduction schemes.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesBoronic AcidsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesFluorometryGeobacillus stearothermophilusGlucokinaseGlucoseGlucose OxidaseHumansLectinsMolecular StructureMonitoring, PhysiologicMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsMutationProtein ConformationBoronic AcidsFluorescent DyesGlucokinaseGlucoseGlucose OxidaseLectinsMonosaccharide Transport Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.