Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15617259›Full record

ReviewJournal of fluorescence2004

Current problems and potential techniques in in vivo glucose monitoring.

Y Wickramasinghe, Y Yang, S A Spencer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fluorescence, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Device integration of electrochemical biosensors.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A glucose-sensing contact lens: from bench top to patient.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y WickramasingheCentre for Science and Technology in Medicine, School of Medicine, Keele University/University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 7QB, United Kingdom.
Y Yang
S A Spencer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate in vivo monitoring of glucose concentration would be a valuable asset, particularly for management of diabetes and preterm infants during critical care. In vivo glucose monitoring devices can be divided into two categories: implanted and non-invasive. Extensive research into in vivo glucose monitoring over recent decades has not resulted in the widespread use of clinically reliable monitoring systems. For implanted devices, poor biocompatibility of the materials used for fabrication remains a major challenge, whilst progress in the commercial development of non-invasive devices is hampered by the problem of multiple interference between the detected signals and the biological components. In this review, the methods available for in in-vivo glucose monitoring are described and the associated problems are discussed.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesBlood GlucoseCalibrationElectric ImpedanceElectrodes, ImplantedFluorometryHumansIontophoresisMonitoring, PhysiologicSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredTransducersTransistors, ElectronicBlood Glucose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.