Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15616601›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2005

Spontaneous uptake of biologically active recombinant DNA by mammalian cells via a selected DNA segment.

M J Lehmann, G Sczakiel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stem cells: promises and realities in cancer research.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J LehmannInstitut für Molekulare Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, Germany.
G Sczakiel
University of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA can be internalized by mammalian cells without taking advantage of helper reagents. Here, we ask whether the spontaneous cellular uptake of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) occurs in a biologically significant and sequence-dependent way. We describe a combinatorial approach to search for dsDNA sequence segments that are preferentially internalized. A selected dsDNA species was identified and covalently linked to a luciferase expression cassette. The increased apparent cellular uptake of long-chain recombinant DNA accompanied by an increased apparent expression of luciferase provides strong evidence for the view that (i) naked long-chain dsDNA can be taken up spontaneously by mammalian cells, (ii) specific sequences substantially increase this process, and (iii) dsDNA is transported into the nucleus of cells in a bioactive form. Experimental evidence indicates a tissue- or cell-type specificity for this process. This work indicates that, in principle, specific nucleotide sequences can facilitate the introduction of naked dsDNA into target cells of interest, thereby improving existing vector systems and providing a new methodology to study DNA uptake by mammalian cells. The cellular uptake of biologically active genetic material in vivo occurs to be conceivable.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBiological TransportCell LineCell MembraneCells, CulturedGenetic TherapyHeLa CellsHumansLuciferasesMolecular Sequence DataPlasmidsRecombinant ProteinsLuciferasesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15616601
OpenAlexW2030077221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.