Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15614507›Full record

ReviewSpringer seminars in immunopathology2005

Complement receptors and the shaping of the natural antibody repertoire.

V Michael Holers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Springer seminars in immunopathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Protective role of host complement system inFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Association of a common complement receptor 2 haplotype with increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

V Michael HolersDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, B-115, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, Denver, CO 80262, USA. michael.holers@uchsc.edu
University of Colorado Health · US

Funding

MOUSE MEMBRANE RCA PROTEINS IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSER01AI031105 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HOLERS, VERNON MICHAEL · 1993 to 2008
$2.6M
C3D/EBV RECEPTOR LIGAND BINDING SITESR01CA053615 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOLERS, VERNON MICHAEL · 1991 to 2006
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R0-1 CA53615NIAID NIH HHS R0-1 AI31105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complement and complement receptors have been known for several decades to play important roles in immune effector mechanisms related to pathogen elimination and tissue inflammation. In addition, studies over the last 10 years have clearly demonstrated a key role for the complement C3d activation fragment receptor designated CR2 (complement receptor type 2) in the switched-isotype, high-affinity and memory humoral immune responses to T-dependent foreign antigens. More recent studies have extended those observations to include a key role for CR2 and C3d in the humoral immune response to T-independent foreign antigens. Conversely, as these studies have proceeded, a parallel series of analyses have linked defects in expression or function of complement C4 and other classical pathway activation pathway proteins, as well as CR2 and the closely related CR1, to the loss of self tolerance to nuclear antigens such as double-stranded DNA and chromatin in systemic lupus erythematosus. With regard to the topic of this issue, it is now becoming increasingly clear that CR2 also plays a major role in the development of the natural antibody repertoire. Specifically, in the absence of this receptor natural IgM and IgG develop in the naïve animal that demonstrate clearly altered recognition patterns for specific natural antibody targets. This repertoire change is important physiologically in at least one setting because these CR2-dependent natural antibodies are necessary for the recognition of ischemic self tissues. In addition, it is possible that certain of the phenotypes manifest by CR2-deficient mice may be strongly influenced not only by effects on later stages of B cell activation and maturation, as commonly thought, but also by alterations in the pre-existing pool of natural antibodies that are influenced by this receptor. This review will examine the evidence that has accumulated over the last few years supporting these hypotheses.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsAntibody FormationAutoimmunityB-LymphocytesComplement ActivationHumansMiceModels, ImmunologicalReceptors, ComplementReceptors, Complement 3dT-LymphocytesReceptors, ComplementReceptors, Complement 3d

Identifiers

PMID15614507
OpenAlexW2023677307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.