Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15613496›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2005

Microarray-based comparison of three amplification methods for nanogram amounts of total RNA.

Ruchira Singh, Rajanikanth J Maganti, Sairam V Jabba, Martin Wang, Glenn Deng, Joe Don Heath, Nurith Kurn, Philine Wangemann

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Stem Cell Strategies to Evaluate Idiosyncratic Drug-induced Liver Injury.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Influence of RNA labeling on expression profiling of microRNAs.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruchira SinghDept. of Anatomy & Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State Univ., 1600 Denison Ave., Coles Hall 205, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Rajanikanth J Maganti
Sairam V Jabba
Martin Wang
Glenn Deng
Joe Don Heath
Nurith Kurn
Philine Wangemann
Kansas State University · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF SMALL RNAS IN ARABIDOPSIS POLLEN DEVELOPMENTP20RR016475 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ACKLEY, BRIAN DOUGLAS · 2001 to 2011
$38.1M
TRANSEPITHELIAL ION TRANSPORT &ITS REGULATIONP20RR017686 · NCRR · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MELGAREJO GARCIA, LUIS TONATIUH · 2002 to 2011
$21.8M
NEUROGENIC REGULATION OF COCHLEAR BLOOD FLOWR01DC004280 · NIDCD · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WANGEMANN, A. PHILINE · 1999 to 2012
$2.6M
CYTOSOLIC REGULATION OF INNER EAR ION TRANSPORTR01DC001098 · NIDCD · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WANGEMANN, A. PHILINE · 1997 to 2007
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016475NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR-017686NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017686NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR-16475NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001098NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004280NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-01098NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-04280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression profiling using microarrays requires microgram amounts of RNA, which limits its direct application for the study of nanogram RNA samples obtained using microdissection, laser capture microscopy, or needle biopsy. A novel system based on Ribo-SPIA technology (RS, Ovation-Biotin amplification and labeling system) was recently introduced. The utility of the RS system, an optimized prototype system for picogram RNA samples (pRS), and two T7-based systems involving one or two rounds of amplification (One RA, Standard Protocol, or Two RA, Small Sample Prototcol, version II) were evaluated in the present study. Mouse kidney (MK) and mouse universal reference (MUR) RNA samples, 0.3 ng to 10 mug, were analyzed using high-density Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 GeneChip arrays. Call concordance between replicates, correlations of signal intensity, signal intensity ratios, and minimal fold increase necessary for significance were determined. All systems amplified partially overlapping sets of genes with similar signal intensity correlations. pRS amplified the highest number of genes from 10-ng RNA samples. We detected 24 of 26 genes verified by RT-PCR in samples prepared using pRS. Two RA yielded somewhat higher call concordances than did RS and pRS (91.8% vs. 89.3% and 88.1%, respectively). Although all target preparation methods were suitable, pRS amplified the highest number of targets and was found to be suitable for amplification of as little as 0.3 ng of total RNA. In addition, RS and pRS were faster and simpler to use than the T7-based methods and resulted in the generation of cDNA, which is more stable than cRNA.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression ProfilingMiceMicroarray AnalysisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsRNASensitivity and SpecificityRNA

Identifiers

PMID15613496
PMCPMC2020524
OpenAlexW2171020233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.