Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15613375›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2005

Determination of transport stoichiometry for two cation-coupled myo-inositol cotransporters: SMIT2 and HMIT.

Francis Bourgeois, Michael J Coady, Jean-Yves Lapointe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Inositols and metabolic disorders: From farm to bedside.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. Inositols in Insulin Signaling and Glucose Metabolism.International journal of endocrinology · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: transporters.British journal of pharmacology · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francis BourgeoisGroupe d'étude des protéines membranaires (GEPROM), Université de Montréal, CP 6128, succ. centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7.
Michael J Coady
Jean-Yves Lapointe
Université de Montréal · CALaboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three different mammalian myo-inositol cotransporters are currently known; two are Na+-coupled (SMIT1 and SMIT2) and one is proton-coupled (HMIT). Although their transport stoichiometries have not been directly determined, significant cooperativities in the Na+ activation of SMIT1 and SMIT2 suggest that more than one Na+ ion drives the transport of each myo-inositol. The two techniques used here to determine transport stoichiometry take advantage of the electrogenicity of both SMIT2 and HMIT expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The first method compares the measurement of charge transferred into voltage-clamped oocytes with the simultaneous uptake of radiolabelled substrate. The second approach uses high accuracy volume measurements to determine the transport-dependent osmolyte uptake and compares it to the amount of charge transported. This method was calibrated using a potassium channel (ROMK2) and was validated with the Na+/glucose cotransporter SGLT1, which has a known stoichiometry of 2 : 1. Volume measurements indicated a stoichiometric ratio of 1.78 +/- 0.27 ion per alpha-methyl-glucose (alphaMG) for SGLT1 whereas the radiotracer uptake method indicated 2.14 +/- 0.05. The two methods yielded a SMIT2 stoichiometry measurement of 1.75 +/- 0.30 and 1.82 +/- 0.10, both in agreement with a 2 Na+:1 myo-inositol stoichiometry. For HMIT, the flux ratio was 1.02 +/- 0.04 charge per myo-inositol, but the volumetric method suggested 0.67 +/- 0.05 charge per myo-inositol molecule. This last value is presumed to be an underestimate of the true stoichiometry of one proton for one myo-inositol molecule due to some proton exchange for osmotically active species. This hypothesis was confirmed by using SGLT1 as a proton-driven glucose cotransporter. In conclusion, despite the inherent difficulty in estimating the osmotic effect of a proton influx, the volumetric method was found valuable as it has the unique capacity of detecting unidentified transported substrates.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological Transport, ActiveCell SizeGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeHeat-Shock ProteinsInositolIn Vitro TechniquesIon TransportMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane PotentialsMembrane ProteinsMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsOocytesSodium-Glucose Transporter 1SymportersXenopus laevisGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeHeat-Shock ProteinsInositolMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsSLC2A13 protein, humanSLC5A3 protein, humanSodium-Glucose Transporter 1Symporters

Identifiers

PMID15613375
PMCPMC1665580
OpenAlexW1502315999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.