Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15611798›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2005

Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.

R J Burcombe, A Makris, P I Richman, F M Daley, S Noble, M Pittam, D Wright, S A Allen, J Dove, G D Wilson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2007
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Response to immunohistochemical markers' conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: association between imaging and histopathologic analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R J BurcombeAcademic Oncology Unit, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK.
A Makris
P I Richman
F M Daley
S Noble
M Pittam
D Wright
S A Allen
J Dove
G D Wilson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary systemic therapy (PST) for operable breast cancer enables the identification of in vivo biological markers that predict response to treatment. A total of 118 patients with T2-4 N0-1 M0 primary breast cancer received six cycles of anthracycline-based PST. Clinical and radiological response was assessed before and after treatment using UICC criteria. A grading system to score pathological response was devised. Diagnostic biopsies and postchemotherapy surgical specimens were stained for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor, HER-2 and cell proliferation (Ki-67). Clinical, radiological and pathological response rates were 78, 72 and 38%, respectively. There was a strong correlation between ER and PgR staining (P < 0.0001). Higher Ki-67 proliferation indices were associated with PgR- tumours (median 28.3%, PgR+ 22.9%; P = 0.042). There was no relationship between HER-2 and other biological markers. No single pretreatment or postchemotherapy biological parameter predicted response by any modality of assessment. In all, 10 tumours changed hormone receptor classification after chemotherapy (three ER, seven PgR); HER-2 staining changed in nine cases. Median Ki-67 index was 24.9% before and 18.1% after treatment (P = 0.02); the median reduction in Ki-67 index after treatment was 21.2%. Tumours displaying >75% reduction in Ki-67 after chemotherapy were more likely to achieve a pathological response (77.8 vs 26.7%, P = 0.004).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAnthracyclinesBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID15611798
PMCPMC2361750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.