Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15611189›Full record

ArticleGenetics2004

Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes.

Hong Qin, Wei Biao Wu, Josep M Comeron, Martin Kreitman, Wen-Hsiung Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase (XET) Genes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hong QinDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Wei Biao Wu
Josep M Comeron
Martin Kreitman
Wen-Hsiung Li

Funding

STATISTICAL STUDIES OF DNA EVOLUTIONR37GM030998 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LI, WEN-HSIUNG · 2000 to 2009
$1.9M
STATISTICAL STUDIES OF DNA EVOLUTIONR01GM030998 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LI, WEN-HSIUNG · 1985 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM30998NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030998NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM030998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the roles of translational accuracy, translational efficiency, and the Hill-Robertson effect in codon usage bias, we studied the intragenic spatial distribution of synonymous codon usage bias in four prokaryotic (Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Sulfolobus tokodaii, and Thermotoga maritima) and two eukaryotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster) genomes. We generated supersequences at each codon position across genes in a genome and computed the overall bias at each codon position. By quantitatively evaluating the trend of spatial patterns using isotonic regression, we show that in yeast and prokaryotic genomes, codon usage bias increases along translational direction, which is consistent with purifying selection against nonsense errors. Fruit fly genes show a nearly symmetric M-shaped spatial pattern of codon usage bias, with less bias in the middle and both ends. The low codon usage bias in the middle region is best explained by interference (the Hill-Robertson effect) between selections at different codon positions. In both yeast and fruit fly, spatial patterns of codon usage bias are characteristically different from patterns of GC-content variations. Effect of expression level on the strength of codon usage bias is more conspicuous than its effect on the shape of the spatial distribution.

Indexed as

CodonAnimalsBacteriaDrosophila melanogasterGenomeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNASulfolobusCodon

Identifiers

PMID15611189
PMCPMC1448744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.