Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15610675›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2005

Efforts to Control Sexually Transmitted Infections As a Means to Limit HIV Transmission: What Is the Evidence?

Gina Dallabetta, Graham Neilsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gina DallabettaInstitute for HIV/AIDS, Family Health International, 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22201, USA. gdallabetta@fhi.org.
Graham Neilsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is overwhelming and compelling evidence that control efforts for sexually transmitted infection (STI) have a major role to play in the prevention of HIV transmission. Community-based randomized controlled trials are set as the highest standard of evidence for showing the efficacy of STI interventions to prevent HIV transmission. The negative results of recent randomized controlled trials have cast doubt on the positive findings of the Mwanza study. Deeper analysis of the result of these trials has improved understanding of the role of STI interventions and augmented the wealth of evidence provided by numerous epidemiologic and biomedical studies. Apart from the biologic impact of effective treatment of curable STIs on HIV transmission, clinical services also support the reduction of HIV risk behaviors. STI interventions should limit the scale of the impending epidemics in Asia and Eastern Europe, depending on the priority that they are given by governments and major donor agencies.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.