Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15609049›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2005

Sizing-up finite fluorescent particles with nanometer-scale precision by convolution and correlation image analysis.

Arne Gennerich, Detlev Schild

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cell biology of mRNA decay.Methods in enzymology · 2008
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arne GennerichPhysiologisches Institut, Universität Göttingen, Humboldtallee 23, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Detlev Schild

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the positions, shapes and sizes of finite living particles such as bacteria, mitochondria or vesicles is of interest in many biological processes. In fluorescence microscopy, algorithms that can simultaneously localize such particles as a function of time and determine the parameters of their shapes and sizes at the nanometer scale are not yet available. Here we develop two such algorithms based on convolution and correlation image analysis that take into account the position, orientation, shape and size of the object being tracked, and we compare the precision of the two algorithms using computer simulations. We show that the precision of both algorithms strongly depends on the object's size. In cases where the diameter of the object is larger than about four to five times the beam waist radius, the convolution algorithm gives a better precision than the correlation algorithm (it leads to more precise parameters), while for smaller object diameters, the correlation algorithm gives superior precision. We apply the convolution algorithm to sequences of confocal laser scanning micrographs of immobile Escherichia coli bacteria, and show that the centroid, the front end, the rear end, the left border and the right border of a bacterium can be determined with a signal-to-noise-dependent precision down to approximately 5 nm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell PolarityCells, ImmobilizedCell SizeEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisEscherichia coliImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceMotionNanotubesParticle SizePattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.