Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15609030›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2005

Estimating relative physical workload using heart rate monitoring: a validation by whole-body indirect calorimetry.

Martin Garet, Gil Boudet, Christophe Montaurier, Michel Vermorel, Jean Coudert, Alain Chamoux

Abstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maximal tachycardia and high cardiac strain during night shifts of emergency physicians.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing the Impact of Work Activities on the Physiological Load in a Sample of Loggers in Sicily (Italy).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Martin GaretLaboratoire de Physiologie, Service d'explorations fonctionnelles cardio-respiratoires, Saint- Etienne, France. martingaret@hotmail.com
Gil Boudet
Christophe Montaurier
Michel Vermorel
Jean Coudert
Alain Chamoux
Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique · FRCentre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d'Auvergne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRUnité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring physical workload in occupational medicine is fundamental for risk prevention. An indirect measurement of total and relative energy expenditure (EE) from heart rate (HR) is widely used but it has never been validated. The aim of this study was to validate this HR-estimated energy expenditure (HREEE) method against whole-body indirect calorimetry. Twenty-four-hour HR and EE values were recorded continuously in a calorimetric chambers for 52 adult males and females (19-65 years). An 8-h working period was retained, comprising several exercise sessions on a cycloergometer at intensities up to 65% of the peak rate of oxygen uptake. HREEE was calculated with reference to cardiac reserve. A corrected HREEE (CHREEE) was also calculated with a modification to the lowest value of cardiac reserve. Both values were further compared to established methods: the flex-HR method, and the use of a 3rd order polynomial relationship to estimate total and relative EE. No significant difference was found in total EE when measured in a calorimetric chamber or estimated from CHREEE for the working period. A perfect linear and identity relationship was found between CHREEE and energy reserve values for intensities ranging from 15% to 65%. Relative physical workload can be accurately assessed from HR recordings when expressed in CHREEE between 15% to 65%, and EE can be accurately estimated using the CHREEE method.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalTask Performance and AnalysisAdultAgedCalorimetry, IndirectComputer SimulationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEnergy MetabolismFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPhysical Exertion

Identifiers

PMID15609030
OpenAlexW2075751524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.