Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15607079›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2005

An ELISA optimized for porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus detection in faeces.

L Rodák, L Valícek, B Smíd, Z Nevoránková

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L RodákVeterinary Research Institute, Department of Virology, Hudcova 70, 621 32 Brno, Czech Republic. rodak@vri.cz
L Valícek
B Smíd
Z Nevoránková
Veterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies to porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV) membrane protein M were prepared and used for the comparative assessment of three blocking ELISA variants to detect PEDV. The competitive blocking ELISA (CB-ELISA) format showed the highest sensitivity, allowing detection of 10(2.5) plaque-forming units of PEDV/ml in culture medium. Its specificity was verified by inclusion of control samples containing transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and rotavirus A in each analysis. Eighty porcine field samples of faeces obtained from 38 herds affected with diarrhoea were examined, and PEDV was found in 15 (19%) samples from 6 (16%) herds. The suitability of the CB-ELISA for the screening herds in epizootiologic situations is discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BlockingAntibodies, MonoclonalCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsDiarrheaElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesImmunoenzyme TechniquesMicroscopy, ElectronSensitivity and SpecificitySwineSwine DiseasesViral Matrix ProteinsAntibodies, BlockingAntibodies, MonoclonalViral Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15607079
PMCPMC7117382
OpenAlexW2020759147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.