ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2005
Bayesian estimation of cyclosporin exposure for routine therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant patients.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ciclosporin population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation in thoracic transplant recipients.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Trial
- The Impact of Spironolactone Co-administration on Cyclosporin Initial Dosage Optimization for Pediatric Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Article
- Factors Affecting Time-Varying Clearance of Cyclosporine in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Population Pharmacokinetic Perspective.Pharmaceutical research · 2021Article
- External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for ciclosporin in adult renal transplant recipients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- Model-Based Determination of Effective Blood Concentrations of Cyclosporine for Neutrophil Response in the Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia in Children.The AAPS journal · 2015Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in transplant recipients.The AAPS journal · 2013Review
- Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A based on NONMEM in Chinese allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2012Article
- A population pharmacokinetic model of ciclosporin applicable for assisting dose management of kidney transplant recipients.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2009Article
- Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2009Review
- Sequential updating of a new dynamic pharmacokinetic model for caffeine in premature neonates.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAUC-based monitoring of cyclosporin A (CsA) is useful to optimize dose adaptation in difficult cases. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model to describe dose-exposure relationships for CsA in renal transplant patients and applied it to the Bayesian estimation of AUCs using three blood concentrations.
methodsA total of 84 renal graft recipients treated with CsA microemulsion were included in this study. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using NONMEM. A two-compartment model with zero-order absorption and a lag time best described the data. Bayesian estimation was based on CsA blood concentrations measured before dosing and 1 h and 2 h post dose. Predictive performance was evaluated using a cross-validation approach. Estimated AUCs were compared with AUCs calculated by the trapezoidal method. The Bayesian approach was also applied to an independent group of eight patients exhibiting unusual pharmacokinetic profiles.
resultsMean population pharmacokinetic parameters were apparent clearance 30 l h(-1), apparent volume of distribution 79.8 l, duration of absorption 52 min, absorption lag time 7 min. No significant relationships were found between any of the pharmacokinetic parameters and individual characteristics. A good correlation was obtained between Bayesian-estimated and experimental AUCs, with a mean prediction error of 2.8% (95% CI [-0.6, 6.2]) and an accuracy of 13.1% (95% CI [7.5, 17.2]). A good correlation was also obtained in the eight patients with unusual pharmacokinetic profiles (r(2) = 0.96, P < 0.01).
conclusionsOur Bayesian approach enabled a good estimation of CsA exposure in a population of patients with variable pharmacokinetic profiles, showing its usefulness for routine AUC-based therapeutic drug monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.