Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15606225›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2004

Economic costs to business of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

Gordon G Liu, Jeff J Guo, Scott R Smith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gordon G LiuUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jeff J Guo
Scott R Smith
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV infection is a devastating disease for individuals and society. The economic burden of employees with HIV infection is a matter of increasing concern for employers. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a comprehensive review of published studies which measured/estimated economic costs incurred by HIV-infected employees, and evaluate the potential economic impact of the HIV/AIDS epidemic on business in different countries. This review finds a conceptual consensus in the literature that suggests that the HIV/AIDS epidemic has a potentially sizable economic cost to business, primarily due to increased costs for employment-based insurance premiums, welfare benefits, lost productivity, new hiring and training, and a downsized economy and labour market. Based on published data in the US, accounting for the first three major cost items, in 2002 an HIV-infected worker would cost an employer in the US an estimated 37,320 US dollars for asymptomatic individuals and 50,374 US dollars for symptomatic individuals per person-year. However, this review found little consistent empirical data in the literature regarding the scale of disease costs specific to businesses in different settings. In addition, the current literature offers little guidance in terms of well designed, validated, and easily replicated analytical frameworks for conducting a comprehensive cost analysis from a business perspective. Future research is needed to improve both the theoretical modelling and empirical work in assessing the full economic impact of the HIV/ADIS epidemic on patients, businesses and society at large.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessCommerceDatabases, FactualDisease OutbreaksEmployer Health CostsHIV InfectionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID15606225
OpenAlexW2078009341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.