Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15605181›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2004

Neonatal candidiasis: analysis of epidemiology, drug susceptibility, and molecular typing of causative isolates.

E Roilides, E Farmaki, J Evdoridou, J Dotis, E Hatziioannidis, M Tsivitanidou, E Bibashi, I Filioti, D Sofianou, C Gil-Lamaignere and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. International, open-label, noncomparative, clinical trial of micafungin alone and in combination for treatment of newly diagnosed and refractory candidemia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Characteristics of Biofilms Formed byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. InvasivePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Antifungal Susceptibility and Clinical Outcome in Neonatal Candidiasis.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clinical and economic burden of invasive fungal diseases in Europe: focus on pre-emptive and empirical treatment of Aspergillus and Candida species.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

E Roilides3rd Department of Pediatrics, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece. roilides@med.auth.gr
E Farmaki
J Evdoridou
J Dotis
E Hatziioannidis
M Tsivitanidou
E Bibashi
I Filioti
D Sofianou
C Gil-Lamaignere
F-M Mueller
G Kremenopoulos
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHippocration General Hospital · GRHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective observational study of invasive candidiasis was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of Aristotle University in Hippokration Hospital between 1994 and 2000. During this period, 59 neonates developed invasive candidiasis (58 cases of candidemia and 1 case of peritonitis), resulting in an overall incidence of 1.28% that showed a decreasing trend over the study period. Eleven (18.6%) cases developed within the first week of life and the others within a mean (+/-SEM) of 13.4+/-1.7 days after birth. The three most frequent causative species were Candida albicans (65.5%), Candida parapsilosis (15.5%), and Candida tropicalis (7%). C. albicans was the predominant species between 1994 and 1998, whereas, non-albicans Candida spp., particularly C. parapsilosis, were the most frequent species during the period 1999-2000 (P<0.001). While the overall mortality due to candidemia was 29% (17 of 59 cases), mortality associated with C. albicans and C. parapsilosis was 39.5% and 11.1%, respectively (P=0.032), and that observed in the 1999-2000 period was 0% (P=0.011). Virtually all isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, and itraconazole, and no increases in minimal inhibitory concentrations were observed during these years. With the exception of a limited cluster of cases due to genotypically identical isolates, no clonal relation of C. albicans isolates was found. Moreover, no clonal persistence of C. albicans and no decrease in antifungal drug susceptibility occurred over the 6-year study period. Non-albicans Candida spp., mostly C. parapsilosis, have emerged as important pathogens in neonatal intensive care units, with infected patients having better outcomes as compared to patients infected with C. albicans.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalAntifungal AgentsArthritis, InfectiousCandidaCandidiasisDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleFungemiaGreeceHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaleMeningitis, FungalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID15605181
OpenAlexW2044398880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.