Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15601996›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2004

Discriminatory suppression of homologous recombination by p53.

Sheng Yun, Chadwick Lie-A-Cheong, Andrew C G Porter

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheng YunGene Targeting Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, UK.
Chadwick Lie-A-Cheong
Andrew C G Porter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) is used in vertebrate somatic cells for essential, RAD51-dependent, repair of DNA double-strand-breaks (DSBs), but inappropriate HR can cause genome instability. A transcriptional transactivation-independent role for p53 in suppressing HR has been established, but is not detected in all HR assays. To address the basis of such exceptions, and the possibility that suppression by p53 may be discriminatory, we have conducted a controlled comparison of the effects of p53 depletion on three different kinds of HR. We show that, within the same cells, p53 depletion promotes both intra-chromosomal HR (ICHR) and extra-chromosomal HR (ECHR), but not homologous DNA integration (gene targeting; GT). This conclusion holds true for both spontaneous and DSB-induced ICHR and GT. We show further that non-conservative ICHR is more susceptible than conservative ICHR to inhibition by p53. These results provide strong evidence that p53 can discriminate between different forms of HR and, despite the fact that GT is used experimentally for gene disruption, is consistent with the possibility that p53 preferentially suppresses genome-destabilizing forms of HR. While the mechanism of suppression by p53 remains unclear, our data suggest that it is independent of mismatch repair and of changes in RAD51 protein levels.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticBase Pair MismatchCell LineDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificGene TargetingHumansRNA InterferenceSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSCEI protein, S cerevisiaeTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID15601996
PMCPMC545454
OpenAlexW2146324449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.