ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine
Skeletal muscle tissue engineering.
Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the piezoelectric phenomenon: From polymers to human tissues and advanced applications in tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- In situ mechanostimulation of biohybrid millirobots for enhanced cell functionality and delivery.Science advances · 2026Article
- Wearable Bioelectronics for Home-Based Monitoring and Treatment of Muscle Atrophy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- RNA Coating Promotes Peri-Implant Osseointegration.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Graphene and its hybrid nanocomposite: A Metamorphoses elevation in the field of tissue engineering.Heliyon · 2024Review
- The Use of Collagen Methacrylate in Actuating Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate-Acrylic Acid Scaffolds for Muscle Regeneration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Cell Adhesion Motif-Functionalized Lipopeptides: Nanostructure and Selective Myoblast Cytocompatibility.Biomacromolecules · 2023Article
- Expansion of bovine skeletal muscle stem cells from spinner flasks to benchtop stirred-tank bioreactors for up to 38 days.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Biomedical applications of three-dimensional bioprinted craniofacial tissue engineering.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Emulsion-templated microparticles with tunable stiffness and topology: Applications as edible microcarriers for cultured meat.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Changes in Elastic Moduli of Fibrin Hydrogels Within the Myogenic Range Alter Behavior of Murine C2C12 and Human C25 Myoblasts Differently.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Available In Vitro Models for Human Satellite Cells from Skeletal Muscle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- GLUT4-overexpressing engineered muscle constructs as a therapeutic platform to normalize glycemia in diabetic mice.Science advances · 2021Article
- Regulation of Myogenic Differentiation by Topologically Microgrooved Surfaces for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Fast photocurable thiol-ene elastomers with tunable biodegradability, mechanical and surface properties enhance myoblast differentiation and contractile function.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- Recycled algae-based carbon materials as electroconductive 3D printed skeletal muscle tissue engineering scaffolds.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Article
- 3D in vitro models of skeletal muscle: myopshere, myobundle and bioprinted muscle construct.Veterinary research · 2021Review
- Optimizations for identifying reference genes in bone and cartilage bioengineering.BMC biotechnology · 2021Article
- Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reconstruction of skeletal muscle tissue either lost by traumatic injury or tumor ablation or functional damage due to myopathies is hampered by the lack of availability of functional substitution of this native tissue. Until now, only few alternatives exist to provide functional restoration of damaged muscle tissues. Loss of muscle mass and their function can surgically managed in part using a variety of muscle transplantation or transposition techniques. These techniques represent a limited degree of success in attempts to restore the normal functioning, however they are not perfect solutions. A new alternative approach to addressing difficult tissue reconstruction is to engineer new tissues. Although those tissue engineering techniques attempting regeneration of human tissues and organs have recently entered into clinical practice, the engineering of skeletal muscle tissue ist still a scientific challenge. This article reviews some of the recent findings resulting from tissue engineering science related to the attempt of creation and regeneration of functional skeletal muscle tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.