Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15601531›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2003

Reconstructing the genomic architecture of mammalian ancestors using multispecies comparative maps.

William J Murphy, Guillaume Bourque, Glenn Tesler, Pavel Pevzner, Stephen J O'Brien

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reconstruction and evolutionary history of eutherian chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  3. Divergent patterns of breakpoint reuse in Muroid rodents.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2010
    Article
  4. Characterization and distribution of retrotransposons and simple sequence repeats in the bovine genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William J MurphyLaboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. murphywi@mail.ncifcrf.gov
Guillaume Bourque
Glenn Tesler
Pavel Pevzner
Stephen J O'Brien

Funding

RADIATION HYBRID MAPPING OF CATS GENES ON THE HUMAN GENOMEZ01BC010265 · BC · BASIC SCIENCES · PI O'BRIEN, STEPHEN J · 1997 to 2006
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly developing comparative gene maps in selected mammal species are providing an opportunity to reconstruct the genomic architecture of mammalian ancestors and study rearrangements that transformed this ancestral genome into existing mammalian genomes. Here, the recently developed Multiple Genome Rearrangement (MGR) algorithm is applied to human, mouse, cat and cattle comparative maps (with 311-470 shared markers) to impute the ancestral mammalian genome. Reconstructed ancestors consist of 70-100 conserved segments shared across the genomes that have been exchanged by rearrangement events along the ordinal lineages leading to modern species genomes. Genomic distances between species, dominated by inversions (reversals) and translocations, are presented in a first multispecies attempt using ordered mapping data to reconstruct the evolutionary exchanges that preceded modern placental mammal genomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsCatsCattleChromosome InversionChromosomesChromosomes, HumanComputational BiologyFemaleGene RearrangementGenetic MarkersGenome, HumanHumansGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID15601531
PMCPMC3525001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.