Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15599723›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2005

Long-term registration of daily jaw muscle activity in juvenile rabbits.

T van Wessel, G E J Langenbach, P Brugman, T M G J van Eijden

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T van WesselDepartment of Functional Anatomy, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.vanwessel@amc.uva.nl
G E J Langenbach
P Brugman
T M G J van Eijden

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding control of muscles during various tasks and their adaptive changes requires information on all motor behavior used throughout the day. The total duration of muscle activity depends on the magnitude of its activation and can change during maturation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the duration of muscle activity (i.e. duty time) exceeding various activity levels in maturing jaw muscles. A telemetric device was implanted into nine juvenile male New Zealand White rabbits to continuously record muscle activity during maturation weeks 9-14. Electrodes were inserted into digastric, superficial and deep masseter, medial pterygoid, and temporalis muscles. Duty times (expressed as a percentage of time) were calculated for activation exceeding different levels (5-90%) of EMG peak activity per 24-h period. At 10 weeks of age, for activation exceeding the 5% level, the duty time of the temporalis (20.0+/-5.2%) was statistically significantly higher than that of the medial pterygoid (11.2+/-1.5%), digastric (11.0+/-5.1%), superficial (12.6+/-5.6%), and deep masseter (8.6+/-5.5%). Duty times declined with increasing activity level. For activation exceeding the 40% level the duty times of the superficial masseter and medial pterygoid were significantly higher than those of the other muscles. During maturation none of the muscles showed a significant change in duty time. However, for activation exceeding the 5% level, the inter-individual variation in duty time decreased significantly for the digastric, and superficial and deep masseter.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAgingAnimalsCircadian RhythmElectromyographyMaleMasseter MuscleMasticationMotor ActivityMuscle ContractionRabbitsTemporal MuscleTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.