Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15596843›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection of golden Syrian hamsters.

Anjeanette Roberts, Leatrice Vogel, Jeannette Guarner, Norman Hayes, Brian Murphy, Sherif Zaki, Kanta Subbarao

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 303 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Meta-Analysis of Rhesus Macaques (Comparative medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Animal models of Long Covid: A hit-and-run disease.Science translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anjeanette RobertsLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. ajroberts@niaid.nih.gov
Leatrice Vogel
Jeannette Guarner
Norman Hayes
Brian Murphy
Sherif Zaki
Kanta Subbarao
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Vaccines, Immunoprophylaxis, and Immunotherapy for SARSZ01AI000934 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI SUBBARAO, KANTA · 2003 to 2008
$1.9M
Vaccines, Immunoprophylaxis, and Immunotherapy for SARSZIAAI000934 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI SUBBARAO, KANTA · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small animal models are needed in order to evaluate the efficacy of candidate vaccines and antivirals directed against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS CoV). We investigated the ability of SARS CoV to infect 5-week-old Golden Syrian hamsters. When administered intranasally, SARS CoV replicates to high titers in the lungs and nasal turbinates. Peak replication in the lower respiratory tract was noted on day 2 postinfection (p.i.) and was cleared by day 7 p.i. Low levels of virus were present in the nasal turbinates of a few hamsters at 14 days p.i. Viral replication in epithelial cells of the respiratory tract was accompanied by cellular necrosis early in infection, followed by an inflammatory response coincident with viral clearance, focal consolidation in pulmonary tissue, and eventual pulmonary tissue repair. Despite high levels of virus replication and associated pathology in the respiratory tract, the hamsters showed no evidence of disease. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in sera at day 7 p.i., and mean titers at day 28 p.i. exceeded 1:400. Hamsters challenged with SARS CoV at day 28 p.i. were completely protected from virus replication and accompanying pathology in the respiratory tract. Comparing these data to the mouse model, SARS CoV replicates to a higher titer and for a longer duration in the respiratory tract of hamsters and is accompanied by significant pathology that is absent in mice. Viremia and extrapulmonary spread of SARS CoV to liver and spleen, which are seen in hamsters, were not detected in mice. The hamster, therefore, is superior to the mouse as a model for the evaluation of antiviral agents and candidate vaccines against SARS CoV replication.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMesocricetusAnimalsCricetinaeFemaleHumansLungSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusTracheaVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID15596843
PMCPMC538722
OpenAlexW2057172638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.