Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15595821›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2004

Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors: past, present, and future.

Paul S-H Park, Slawomir Filipek, James W Wells, Krzysztof Palczewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Structural aspects of rod opsin and their implication in genetic diseases.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin: a historical perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015
    Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul S-H ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6485, USA. ppark4@u.washington.edu
Slawomir Filipek
James W Wells
Krzysztof Palczewski

Funding

REGULATION OF RHODOPSIN KINASE AND GUANYLATE CYCLASER01EY008061 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PALCZEWSKI, KRZYSZTOF · 1994 to 2014
$9.5M
RHODOPSIN KINASE: REGULATION, FUNCTION AND STRUCTURER29EY008061 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PALCZEWSKI, KRZYSZTOF NMI · 1989 to 1993
–
NEI NIH HHS EY08061NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signal transduction has been studied for more than a century. Despite the intense focus on this class of proteins, a molecular understanding of what constitutes the functional form of the receptor is still uncertain. GPCRs have traditionally been conceptualized as monomeric proteins, and this view has changed little over the years until relatively recently. Recent biochemical and biophysical studies have challenged this traditional concept, and point instead to a mechanistic view of signal transduction wherein the receptor functions as an oligomer. Cooperative interactions within such an oligomeric array may be critical for the propagation of an external signal across the cell membrane and to the G protein, and may therefore underlie the mechanistic basis of signaling.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsArrestinBiopolymersHumansProtein ConformationReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRhodopsinVision, OcularArrestinBiopolymersReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID15595821
PMCPMC1752221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.