Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15592499›Full record

ReviewOncogene2005

The life and death of DNA-PK.

Spencer J Collis, Theodore L DeWeese, Penelope A Jeggo, Antony R Parker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 406 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. DNA Damage and Its Role in Cancer Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. FOXOs: masters of the equilibrium.The FEBS journal · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Spencer J CollisDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. spencer.collis@cancer.org.uk
Theodore L DeWeese
Penelope A Jeggo
Antony R Parker
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise endogenously during normal cellular processes and exogenously by genotoxic agents such as ionizing radiation (IR). DSBs are one of the most severe types of DNA damage, which if left unrepaired are lethal to the cell. Several different DNA repair pathways combat DSBs, with nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) being one of the most important in mammalian cells. Competent NHEJ catalyses repair of DSBs by joining together and ligating two free DNA ends of little homology (microhomology) or DNA ends of no homology. The core components of mammalian NHEJ are the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PK(cs)), Ku subunits Ku70 and Ku80, Artemis, XRCC4 and DNA ligase IV. DNA-PK is a nuclear serine/threonine protein kinase that comprises a catalytic subunit (DNA-PK(cs)), with the Ku subunits acting as the regulatory element. It has been proposed that DNA-PK is a molecular sensor for DNA damage that enhances the signal via phosphorylation of many downstream targets. The crucial role of DNA-PK in the repair of DSBs is highlighted by the hypersensitivity of DNA-PK(-/-) mice to IR and the high levels of unrepaired DSBs after genotoxic insult. Recently, DNA-PK has emerged as a suitable genetic target for molecular therapeutics such as siRNA, antisense and novel inhibitory small molecules. This review encompasses the recent literature regarding the role of DNA-PK in the protection of genomic stability and focuses on how this knowledge has aided the development of specific DNA-PK inhibitors, via both small molecule and directed molecular targeting techniques. This review promotes the inhibition of DNA-PK as a valid approach to enhance the tumor-cell-killing effects of treatments such as IR.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairGenetic TherapyDNADNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA InterferenceDNADNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPRKDC protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID15592499
OpenAlexW2022685241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.