Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15592405›Full record

ArticleNature2004

A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Gane Ka-Shu Wong, Bin Liu, Jun Wang, Yong Zhang, Xu Yang, Zengjin Zhang, Qingshun Meng, Jun Zhou, Dawei Li, Jingjing Zhang and 105 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Refining theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  19. Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

115 authors.

Gane Ka-Shu WongBeijing Institute of Genomics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Genomics Institute, Beijing Proteomics Institute, Beijing 101300, China.
Bin Liu
Jun Wang
Yong Zhang
Xu Yang
Zengjin Zhang
Qingshun Meng
Jun Zhou
Dawei Li
Jingjing Zhang
Peixiang Ni
Songgang Li
Longhua Ran
Heng Li
Jianguo Zhang
Ruiqiang Li
Shengting Li
Hongkun Zheng
Wei Lin
Guangyuan Li
Xiaoling Wang
Wenming Zhao
Jun Li
Chen Ye
Mingtao Dai
Jue Ruan
Yan Zhou
Yuanzhe Li
Ximiao He
Yunze Zhang
Jing Wang
Xiangang Huang
Wei Tong
Jie Chen
Jia Ye
Chen Chen
Ning Wei
Guoqing Li
Le Dong
Fengdi Lan
Yongqiao Sun
Zhenpeng Zhang
Zheng Yang
Yingpu Yu
Yanqing Huang
Dandan He
Yan Xi
Dong Wei
Qiuhui Qi
Wenjie Li
Jianping Shi
Miaoheng Wang
Fei Xie
Jianjun Wang
Xiaowei Zhang
Pei Wang
Yiqiang Zhao
Ning Li
Ning Yang
Wei Dong
Songnian Hu
Changqing Zeng
Weimou Zheng
Bailin Hao
Ladeana W Hillier
Shiaw-Pyng Yang
Wesley C Warren
Richard K Wilson
Mikael Brandström
Hans Ellegren
Richard P M A Crooijmans
Jan J van der Poel
Henk Bovenhuis
Martien A M Groenen
Ivan Ovcharenko
Laurie Gordon
Lisa Stubbs
Susan Lucas
Tijana Glavina
Andrea Aerts
Pete Kaiser
Lisa Rothwell
John R Young
Sally Rogers
Brian A Walker
Andy van Hateren
Jim Kaufman
Nat Bumstead
Susan J Lamont
Huaijun Zhou
Paul M Hocking
David Morrice
Dirk-Jan de Koning
Andy Law
Neil Bartley
David W Burt
Henry Hunt
Hans H Cheng
Ulrika Gunnarsson
Per Wahlberg
Leif Andersson
Ellen Kindlund
Martti T Tammi
Björn Andersson
Caleb Webber
Chris P Ponting
Ian M Overton
Paul E Boardman
Haizhou Tang
Simon J Hubbard
Stuart A Wilson
Jun Yu
Jian Wang
Huanming Yang
International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/13497Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a genetic variation map for the chicken genome containing 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This map is based on a comparison of the sequences of three domestic chicken breeds (a broiler, a layer and a Chinese silkie) with that of their wild ancestor, red jungle fowl. Subsequent experiments indicate that at least 90% of the variant sites are true SNPs, and at least 70% are common SNPs that segregate in many domestic breeds. Mean nucleotide diversity is about five SNPs per kilobase for almost every possible comparison between red jungle fowl and domestic lines, between two different domestic lines, and within domestic lines--in contrast to the notion that domestic animals are highly inbred relative to their wild ancestors. In fact, most of the SNPs originated before domestication, and there is little evidence of selective sweeps for adaptive alleles on length scales greater than 100 kilobases.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsPhysical Chromosome MappingAllelesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, DomesticChickensChromosomesFemaleHaplotypesHumansMolecular Sequence DataOrnithine CarbamoyltransferasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticOrnithine Carbamoyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID15592405
PMCPMC2263125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.