Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15591620›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2005

The role of B cells and accessory cells in the neonatal response to TI-2 antigens.

Cheri D Landers, R Lakshman Chelvarajan, Subbarao Bondada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Glycans in Human Immunity-A Sweet Code.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Parasite Carbohydrate Vaccines.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheri D LandersDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Sanders Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. cdland2@uky.edu
R Lakshman Chelvarajan
Subbarao Bondada
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neonate has an increased susceptibility to infection, in part owing to an inability to produce antibody to thymus-independent antigens such as bacterial polysaccharides (PS). This poor response to PS antigens is likely owing to multiple factors. Neonatal B cells are of an immature phenotype, as evidenced by cell-surface marker characteristics and increased susceptibility to tolerance induction. The spleen of the neonate has a different cellular composition, which is most prominent in the marginal zone. Neonatal accessory cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) appear to produce less stimulatory cytokines and an overabundance of inhibitory cytokines. This review examines the current data supporting the role of B cells and accessory cells in the neonatal unresponsiveness to PS antigens.

Indexed as

Antigen-Presenting CellsAntigens, T-IndependentB-LymphocytesHumansInfant, NewbornSpleenAntigens, T-Independent

Identifiers

PMID15591620
OpenAlexW2019696035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.