Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15590939›Full record

ArticleGenome research2005

Evolution of the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome region in vertebrates.

Martina Paulsen, Tarang Khare, Christopher Burgard, Sascha Tierling, Jörn Walter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. BACs as tools for the study of genomic imprinting.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evolution of the CDKN1C-KCNQ1 imprinted domain.BMC evolutionary biology · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is imprinting in printing or in press?Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina PaulsenUniversität des Saarlandes, FR 8.3 Biowissenschaften, Genetik/Epigenetik, Postfach 151150, D-66041 Saarbrücken, Germany. m.paulsen@mx.uni-saarland.de
Tarang Khare
Christopher Burgard
Sascha Tierling
Jörn Walter
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the animal kingdom, genomic imprinting appears to be restricted to mammals. It remains an open question how structural features for imprinting evolved in mammalian genomes. The clustering of genes around imprinting control centers (ICs) is regarded as a hallmark for the coordinated imprinted regulation. Hence imprinted clusters might be structurally distinct between mammals and nonimprinted vertebrates. To address this question we compared the organization of the Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) gene cluster in mammals, chicken, Fugu (pufferfish), and zebrafish. Our analysis shows that gene synteny is apparently well conserved between mammals and birds, and is detectable but less pronounced in fish. Hence, clustering apparently evolved during vertebrate radiation and involved two major duplication events that took place before the separation of the fish and mammalian lineages. A cross-species analysis of imprinting center regions showed that some structural features can already be recognized in nonimprinted amniotes in one of the imprinting centers (IC2). In contrast, the imprinting center IC1 is absent in chicken. This suggests a progressive and stepwise evolution of imprinting control elements. In line with that, imprinting centers in mammals apparently exhibit a high degree of structural and sequence variation despite conserved epigenetic marking.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsArmadillosBase CompositionBeckwith-Wiedemann SyndromeBirdsCattleChickensChiropteraConserved SequenceCpG IslandsFishesGene DuplicationGenomic ImprintingHumansMammals

Identifiers

PMID15590939
PMCPMC540281
OpenAlexW1998273026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.