Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15590938›Full record

ArticleGenome research2005

Structural and functional analysis of a 0.5-Mb chicken region orthologous to the imprinted mammalian Ascl2/Mash2-Igf2-H19 region.

Takaaki Yokomine, Hisao Shirohzu, Wahyu Purbowasito, Atsushi Toyoda, Hisakazu Iwama, Kazuho Ikeo, Tetsuya Hori, Shigeki Mizuno, Masaoki Tsudzuki, Yoh-ichi Matsuda and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Building Haplotype-Resolved 3D Genome Maps of Chicken Skeletal Muscle.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BACs as tools for the study of genomic imprinting.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Takaaki YokomineDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Integrated Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.
Hisao Shirohzu
Wahyu Purbowasito
Atsushi Toyoda
Hisakazu Iwama
Kazuho Ikeo
Tetsuya Hori
Shigeki Mizuno
Masaoki Tsudzuki
Yoh-ichi Matsuda
Masahira Hattori
Yoshiyuki Sakaki
Hiroyuki Sasaki
National Institute of Genetics · JPRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPHiroshima University · JPHokkaido University · JPNihon University · JPRIKEN · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies revealed that Igf2 and Mpr/Igf2r are imprinted in eutherian mammals and marsupials but not in monotremes or birds. Igf2 lies in a large imprinted cluster in eutherians, and its imprinting is regulated by long-range mechanisms. As a step to understand how the imprinted cluster evolved, we have determined a 490-kb chicken sequence containing the orthologs of mammalian Ascl2/Mash2, Ins2 and Igf2. We found that most of the genes in this region are conserved between chickens and mammals, maintaining the same transcriptional polarities and exon-intron structures. However, H19, an imprinted noncoding transcript, was absent from the chicken sequence. Chicken ASCL2/CASH4 and INS, the orthologs of the imprinted mammalian genes, showed biallelic expression, further supporting the notion that imprinting evolved after the divergence of mammals and birds. The H19 imprinting center and many of the local regulatory elements identified in mammals were not found in chickens. Also, a large segment of tandem repeats and retroelements identified between the two imprinted subdomains in mice was not found in chickens. Our findings show that the imprinted genes were clustered before the emergence of imprinting and that the elements associated with imprinting probably evolved after the divergence of mammals and birds.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigens, CDBase SequenceChick EmbryoChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCpG IslandsDNA MethylationGenetic MarkersGenomic ImprintingHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIMembrane ProteinsMiceMitochondrial ProteinsAntigens, CDCD81 protein, humanCd81 protein, mouseGenetic MarkersInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIMembrane ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsRNA, UntranslatedTetraspanin 28

Identifiers

PMID15590938
PMCPMC540284
OpenAlexW2145851060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.