Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15590927›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2004

Spatial and temporal organization of ensemble representations for different odor classes in the moth antennal lobe.

Hong Lei, Thomas A Christensen, John G Hildebrand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuron synchronization analyzed through spatial-temporal attention.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Network mechanism for insect olfaction.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021
    Article
  11. Early olfactory, but not gustatory processing, is affected by the selection of heritable cognitive phenotypes in honey bee.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong LeiArizona Research Laboratories, Division of Neurobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
Thomas A Christensen
John G Hildebrand

Funding

GLOMERULI AS FUNCTIONAL UNITS FOR OLFACTORY CODINGR01DC002751 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HILDEBRAND, JOHN G · 1995 to 2013
$4.1M
AMINERGIC MODULATION UNDERLYING OLFACTORY PLASTICITYR01DC005652 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI NIGHORN, ALAN J · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-02751NIDCD NIH HHS DC-05652NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002751NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the insect antennal lobe, odor discrimination depends on the ability of the brain to read neural activity patterns across arrays of uniquely identifiable olfactory glomeruli. Less is understood about the complex temporal dynamics and interglomerular interactions that underlie these spatial patterns. Using neural-ensemble recording, we show that the evoked firing patterns within and between groups of glomeruli are odor dependent and organized in both space and time. Simultaneous recordings from up to 15 units per ensemble were obtained from four zones of glomerular neuropil in response to four classes of odorants: pheromones, monoterpenoids, aromatics, and aliphatics. Each odor class evoked a different pattern of excitation and inhibition across recording zones. The excitatory response field for each class was spatially defined, but inhibitory activity was spread across the antennal lobe, reflecting a center-surround organization. Some chemically related odorants were not easily distinguished by their spatial patterns, but each odorant evoked transient synchronous firing across a uniquely different subset of ensemble units. Examination of 535 cell pairs revealed a strong relationship between their recording positions, temporal correlations, and similarity of odor response profiles. These findings provide the first definitive support for a nested architecture in the insect olfactory system that uses both spatial and temporal coordination of firing to encode chemosensory signals. The spatial extent of the representation is defined by a stereotyped focus of glomerular activity for each odorant class, whereas the transient temporal correlations embedded within the ensemble provide a second coding dimension that can facilitate discrimination between chemically similar volatiles.

Indexed as

OdorantsAction PotentialsAldehydesAnimalsBrainBrain MappingDiscrimination, PsychologicalMaleManducaMonoterpenesOlfactory PathwaysPhysical StimulationSalicylatesSex AttractantsAldehydesmethyl salicylateMonoterpenesSalicylatesSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID15590927
PMCPMC6730268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.