Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15589577›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2005

Progesterone receptor isoform identification and subcellular localization in endometrial cancer.

Kimberly K Leslie, Mary-Pat Stein, Nirmala S Kumar, Donghai Dai, Janet Stephens, Angela Wandinger-Ness, Deborah H Glueck

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular cues on obesity signals, tumor markers and endometrial cancer.Hormone molecular biology and clinical investigation · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Endometrial cancer.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly K LeslieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, ACC-4, 211 Lomas Boulevard, NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Mary-Pat Stein
Nirmala S Kumar
Donghai Dai
Janet Stephens
Angela Wandinger-Ness
Deborah H Glueck
University of New Mexico · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

Power and Sample Size Methods for Mammography TrialsK07CA088811 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GLUECK, DEBORAH HELEN · 2002 to 2009
$734k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA088811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThese studies were undertaken to characterize the subcellular localization of the two major isoforms of progesterone receptors (PR), PRA and PRB, in endometrial cancer.

methodsImmunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation, and confocal microscopy were performed using Hec50co and KLE endometrial cancer cell models expressing PRA or PRB as a consequence of transduction. The location of PRB compared to PRA was determined, and antibodies were tested for specificity with respect to PR isoform recognition. Immunohistochemical analyses of PR expression and subcellular compartmentalization were also performed on 20 formalin-fixed endometrial cancer tumors.

resultsMorphological and biochemical evaluations demonstrated that PRA is localized to the nucleus, even in the absence of progesterone. In contrast, a large proportion of PRB is cytoplasmic in the absence of ligand, but is rapidly translocated to the nucleus in the presence of progesterone. The differential distribution of PRA and PRB proved to be a hallmark of malignant and nonmalignant epithelia in 20 samples of archival endometrial tissue from women with the pre-operative diagnosis of endometrial cancer. All endometrial cancer specimens demonstrated cytoplasmic PRB in 50% or more of the cells, and five of the seven tumors that were moderately to poorly differentiated demonstrated no PRB staining in the nuclei. Nuclear PRB was significantly associated with increasing tumor differentiation (P = 0.031).

conclusionIn the absence of ligand, PRA is nuclear and PRB is largely cytoplasmic. This suggests that PRA may exert ligand-independent nuclear effects, while PRB may have nongenomic cytoplasmic actions in endometrial cancer cells.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCytoplasmEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunoprecipitationReceptors, ProgesteroneSubcellular FractionsAntibodies, Monoclonalprogesterone receptor Aprogesterone receptor BReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID15589577
PMCPMC2755492
OpenAlexW2006156792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.