Trial reportHuman genomics2004
The impact of sample size and marker selection on the study of haplotype structures.
Trial report in Human genomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-to-phenome research in rats: progress and perspectives.International journal of biological sciences · 2021Review
- Variability at the 3' untranslated region of the HLA-G gene: a study on patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus retinochoroiditis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Genetic variations in the SMAD4 gene and gastric cancer susceptibility.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010Article
- Evaluation of sample size effect on the identification of haplotype blocks.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- Efficacy assessment of SNP sets for genome-wide disease association studies.Nucleic acids research · 2007Article
- A model-based approach to selection of tag SNPs.BMC bioinformatics · 2006Article
- A detailed Hapmap of the Sitosterolemia locus spanning 69 kb; differences between Caucasians and African-Americans.BMC medical genetics · 2006Article
- The effect of single-nucleotide polymorphism marker selection on patterns of haplotype blocks and haplotype frequency estimates.American journal of human genetics · 2005Article
- Genome-wide definitive haplotypes determined using a collection of complete hydatidiform moles.Genome research · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies of haplotype structures in the human genome in various populations have found that the human chromosomes are structured such that each chromosome can be divided into many blocks, within which there is limited haplotype diversity. In addition, only a few genetic markers in a putative block are needed to capture most of the diversity within a block. There has been no systematic empirical study of the effects of sample size and marker set on the identified block structures and representative marker sets, however. The purpose of this study was to conduct a detailed empirical study to examine such impacts. Towards this goal, we have analysed three representative autosomal regions from a large genome-wide study of haplotypes with samples consisting of African-Americans and samples consisting of Japanese and Chinese individuals. For both populations, we have found that the sample size and marker set have significant impact on the number of blocks and the total number of representative markers identified. The marker set in particular has very strong impacts, and our results indicate that the marker density in the original datasets may not be adequate to allow a meaningful characterisation of haplotype structures. In general, we conclude that we need a relatively large sample size and a very dense marker panel in the study of haplotype structures in human populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.