ReviewDrugs2004
Oral direct thrombin inhibition: an effective and novel approach for venous thromboembolism.
Review in Drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in healthy elderly subjects.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2008Trial
- The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007Trial
- The effects of dabigatran etexilate on fracture healing in rats: An experimental study.Indian journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism is a serious illness that affects patient morbidity and mortality and presents a significant management challenge to healthcare providers world-wide. Despite major achievements in the significant reduction of thromboembolic complications, the most common therapies currently used for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism--heparins and vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin--have several limitations. In particular, unfractionated heparin and warfarin show significant inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, which makes regular coagulation monitoring necessary. Furthermore, only warfarin is suitable for long-term use, as it is administered orally. A new class of anticoagulants has been developed that directly target thrombin, a key enzyme in the blood coagulation cascade. Unlike warfarin and heparin, these direct thrombin inhibitors are able to inhibit fibrin-bound thrombin and so produce more effective inhibition of coagulation. Importantly, some members of this class of drugs have been developed for oral administration. Ximelagatran, which is converted to its active form melagatran, has predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Therefore, ximelagatran can be administered in fixed doses with no need for coagulation monitoring. Its efficacy and safety profile have been demonstrated in preclinical and clinical studies. As the first oral agent in the new class, direct thrombin inhibitors, ximelagatran has significant potential for improving the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.