ArticleNucleic acids research2004
Different patterns in the recognition of editing sites in plant mitochondria.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins: Building a Toolkit for Precise RNA Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Targeted introduction of premature stop codon in plant mitochondrial mRNA by a designer pentatricopeptide repeat protein with C-to-U editing function.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Plant organellar RNA maturation.The Plant cell · 2023Review
- U-to-C RNA editing by synthetic PPR-DYW proteins in bacteria and human culture cells.Communications biology · 2022Article
- A synthetic RNA editing factor edits its target site in chloroplasts and bacteria.Communications biology · 2021Article
- One C-to-U RNA Editing Site and Two Independently Evolved Editing Factors: Testing Reciprocal Complementation with DYW-Type PPR Proteins from the MossThe Plant cell · 2020Article
- Molecular and Functional Diversity of RNA Editing in Plant Mitochondria.Molecular biotechnology · 2018Review
- Article
- An RNA recognition motif-containing protein is required for plastid RNA editing in Arabidopsis and maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Deletions in cox2 mRNA result in loss of splicing and RNA editing and gain of novel RNA editing sites.PloS one · 2013Article
- The RNA editing pattern of cox2 mRNA is affected by point mutations in plant mitochondria.PloS one · 2011Article
- Intron RNA editing is essential for splicing in plant mitochondria.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- Insights into the evolution of mitochondrial genome size from complete sequences of Citrullus lanatus and Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae).Molecular biology and evolution · 2010Article
- Testing for selection on synonymous sites in plant mitochondrial DNA: the role of codon bias and RNA editing.Journal of molecular evolution · 2010Article
- Multiple specificity recognition motifs enhance plant mitochondrial RNA editing in vitro.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2008Article
- Article
- Two RNA editing sites with cis-acting elements of moderate sequence identity are recognized by an identical site-recognition protein in tobacco chloroplasts.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Plastid mRNAs are neither spliced nor edited in maize and cauliflower mitochondrial in organello systems.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2007Article
- RNA editing site recognition in heterologous plant mitochondria.Current genetics · 2006Article
- Patterns of partial RNA editing in mitochondrial genes of Beta vulgaris.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Higher plant mitochondrial mRNAs are extensively modified by highly specific C-to-U conversions. However, the determinants of recognition specificity are, to date, unknown. Here, we analyse the cis-elements involved in the recognition of two editing sites in a cox2 gene in wheat mitochondria. A minimal region of 23 nt was found to be involved in recognition of the editing site C77, similar to our previous report for site C259. These regions were correctly recognized by the mitochondrial editing machinery when placed elsewhere in the transcript. The nearest neighbour residues of the target C play a crucial role in editing, but the nature and position of the residue varies according to the editing site concerned. The target region seems to be formed by two regions 5' and 3', which can be separated by a maximum of two residues. Studies on single residue mutants concerning every position in the 23 nt region indicated that editing sites are affected differently by their neighbouring sequences. These results suggest that, notwithstanding the similar extent and location of cis-elements, the editing site recognition mechanisms may differ in plant mitochondria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.