ArticleMund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG2005
[Osteoblast reaction on SLA and microgrooved implant surfaces].
Article in Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating adhesion of primary human gingival fibroblasts and osteoblasts to orthodontic mini-implants by scanning electron microscopy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- In Vitro Effect of Modified Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant Abutments on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes Migration and Proliferation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Investigation of biomaterials by human epithelial gingiva cells: an in vitro study.Head & face medicine · 2012Article
- Behavior of osteoblastic cells cultured on titanium and structured zirconia surfaces.Head & face medicine · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The osseointegration process of dental implants depends on the tissue reaction at the tissue-implant interface. Osteoblasts are the main cells responsible for the regulation of osteoinduction. The manner and kinetics of the tissue reaction crucially depend on the interaction between osteoblasts and the morphology of the implant surface. The aim of this study was to investigate osteoblast behaviour on different implant surfaces (smooth, microgrooved, SLA) under standardized conditions. For this in vitro investigation we used primary bovine osteoblasts. Attachment kinetics, proliferation rate and synthesis of bone-associated proteins were used as parameters for cell reaction. The results demonstrate that both attachment and adhesion strength of the primary cell surface interaction was higher on the microgrooved surfaces than on SLA surfaces. The proliferation rate of cells and the synthesis of bone-specific proteins were higher on microgrooved surfaces in contrast to SLA surfaces. Ultrastructural analysis revealed phenotypic osteoblast-like cells on smooth and microgrooved surfaces, whereas cells on SLA surfaces showed a more fibroblastic appearance. This study demonstrates that the morphology of the implant surface determined the subsequent osteoblast reaction. An optimal cell reaction was found at surfaces which are smooth in the microenvironment of osteoblasts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.