Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15583297›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

High prevalence of natural Chlamydophila species infection in calves.

JunBae Jee, Fred J Degraves, TeaYoun Kim, Bernhard Kaltenboeck

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

JunBae JeeDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, 270 Greene Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5519, USA.
Fred J Degraves
TeaYoun Kim
Bernhard Kaltenboeck
Auburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the acquisition and prevalence of Chlamydophila sp. infection in calves. Specimens were collected at weekly intervals from birth to week 12 postpartum from 40 female Holstein calf-dam pairs in a dairy herd. Real-time PCR detected, quantified, and differentiated Chlamydophila 23S rRNA gene DNA from vaginal cytobrush swabs and milk samples. Chemiluminescence enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with lysed Chlamydophila abortus or Chlamydophila pecorum elementary body antigens quantified antibodies against Chlamydophila spp. in sera. Chlamydophila sp. DNA was found in 61% of calves and 20% of dams in at least one positive quantitative PCR. In calves, clinically inapparent C. pecorum infection with low organism loads was fivefold more prevalent than C. abortus infection and was most frequently detected by vaginal swabs compared to rectal or nasal swabs. In dams, C. abortus dominated in milk and C. pecorum dominated in the vagina. The group size of calves correlated positively (P < 0.01) with Chlamydophila infection in quadratic, but not linear, regression. Thus, a doubling of the group size was associated with a fourfold increase in frequency and intensity of Chlamydophila infection. For groups of 14 or 28 calves, respectively, logistic regression predicted a 9 or 52% probability of infection of an individual calf and a 52 or 99.99% probability of infection of the group. Anti-Chlamydophila immunoglobulin M antibodies in Chlamydophila PCR-positive calves and dams and in dams that gave birth to calves that later became positive were significantly higher than in PCR-negative animals (P </= 0.02). Collectively, crowding strongly enhances the frequency and intensity of highly prevalent Chlamydophila infections in cattle.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, BacterialCattleCattle DiseasesChlamydophilaChlamydophila InfectionsDNA, RibosomalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemalePolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceRNA, Ribosomal, 23SAntibodies, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID15583297
PMCPMC535223
OpenAlexW2080498768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.