Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15581524›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2004

Adolescent pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes: a longitudinal examination.

Cynthia Rosengard, Maureen G Phipps, Nancy E Adler, Jonathan M Ellen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Social Production and Salience of Young Women's Desire for Sex.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fertility among orphans in rural Malawi: challenging common assumptions about risk and mechanisms.International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cynthia RosengardDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02903, USA. cynthia_rosengard@brown.edu
Maureen G Phipps
Nancy E Adler
Jonathan M Ellen

Funding

PERCEIVED RISK FOR SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESR01AI036986 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI ELLEN, JONATHAN M · 1995 to 2003
$2.6M
Partner Specific Factors in Adolescent BehaviorK01MH067490 · NIMH · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI ROSENGARD, CYNTHIA · 2003 to 2007
$596k
NIAID NIH HHS AI36986NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI036986NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH067490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose(a) To examine different methods of assessing pregnancy intention; (b) to identify psychosocial differences between those who indicate pregnancy intentions and those who do not; and (c) to examine the relationship between pregnancy intentions and subsequent pregnancy at 6-month follow-up in nonpregnant (at baseline), sexually experienced adolescent females.

methodsLongitudinal cohort study of 354 sexually experienced female adolescents attending either a STD clinic or HMO adolescent medicine clinic in northern California. Student's t-tests and regressions examined psychosocial differences between females who reported "any" and "no" pregnancy intentions. ANOVAs examined differences among different combinations of pregnancy plans/likelihood. Chi-square analyses assessed associations between baseline pregnancy intentions and subsequent pregnancy.

resultsAdolescents' reports of their pregnancy plans and their assessments of pregnancy likelihood differed from one another (chi2 = 50.39, df = 1, p < .001). Pregnancy attitudes and baseline contraceptive use differentiated those with inconsistent pregnancy intentions (Not Planning, but Likely) from those with clear pregnancy intentions (Planning and Likely, and Not Planning and Not Likely) (Pregnancy Attitudes: F [2,338] = 68.96, p < .0001; Contraceptive Use: F [2,308] = 14.87, p < .0001). Suspected pregnancies and positive pregnancy test results were associated with baseline pregnancy intentions (Suspected: chi2 = 19.08, df = 2, p < .01; Positive Results: chi2 = 8.84, df = 2, p = .015).

conclusionsTo reduce adolescent childbearing we must assess pregnancy intentions in multiple ways. Information/education might benefit those female adolescents with inconsistent reports of pregnancy intentions.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorIntentionPregnancy OutcomeSelf DisclosureAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAnalysis of VarianceAttitude to HealthCaliforniaChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPregnancy in Adolescence

Identifiers

PMID15581524
PMCPMC1602042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.