ReviewCNS drugs2004
Interferons in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: are there benefits from long-term use?
Review in CNS drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases in young adults in western countries. An important aspect of treatment of this disease is the use of interferons (IFNs). These are molecules with antiviral, immunomodulatory, antiproliferative and hormonal activities. IFNbeta, a class I IFN, has been used extensively in the therapy of MS, particularly in its relapsing-remitting (RRMS) phase, the most frequent clinical form of the disease. Although the available evidence from published clinical trials is difficult to evaluate because of methodological differences, an unbiased review of the data reveals sufficient evidence to conclude that treatment with IFNbeta in RRMS is both efficacious and safe, at least over the periods so far investigated (up to 4-6 years). While there is no reason to suspect that IFNbeta should not continue to be efficacious and safe over the longer term, studies investigating these questions over longer periods and including greater numbers of patients are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.