ReviewDer Nervenarzt2005
[Care requirements for severe mental disorders. Scientific evidence for integration of clinical psychiatry and community psychiatry].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention of rehospitalization in schizophrenia: results of an integrated care project in Germany.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2009Trial
- Descriptive Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Counseling and Coordination Model in Psychosocial Care. Integration of Health Care and Social Rehabilitation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Integrated Care in a Regional Psychiatry Budget - A Pre-Post Comparison by Secondary Data Analysis.International journal of integrated care · 2016Article
- [Innovative patient-centered care systems: International perspectives].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Review
- The costs of schizophrenia and predictors of hospitalisation from the statutory health insurance perspective.Health economics review · 2012Article
- [Treatment of chronic psychiatric disorders. Ethical and anthropological aspects].Der Nervenarzt · 2009Review
- [Innovative structuring in German care for schizophrenics].Der Nervenarzt · 2009Review
- ["Scientific Evidence": or: "The methodical attraction of the lawnmower"].Der Nervenarzt · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Germany it is not clear which forms of community mental health care should be encouraged to meet the needs particularly of the severely mentally ill. We performed a literature review of systematic meta-analyses and controlled trials and show that a set of well-evaluated and effective psychiatric care systems is available, of which only a few are being implemented in Germany. It becomes obvious that in Germany organizational requirements for an integration of psychiatric services are not being adequately met, particularly in the case of schizophrenia. Team-based assertive community treatment, crisis intervention teams, community mental health teams, and modern job rehabilitation programs, which have been established primarily in English-speaking countries, could not be effectively adapted for German psychiatric care. At the same time many psychiatric care models have been poorly evaluated. Given the available scientific evidence we comment on future requisites and further developments in German psychiatry to meet the growing need of care for people with severe mental illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15580465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.