Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15578105›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2004

Diversity and recognition efficiency of T cell responses to cancer.

Tor B Stuge, Susan P Holmes, Sahdev Saharan, Andrea Tuettenberg, Mario Roederer, Jeffrey S Weber, Peter P Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Peptide-based vaccine for cancer therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  4. T-cell repertoire diversity: friend or foe for protective antitumor response?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  5. Position-Scanning Peptide Libraries as Particle Immunogens for Improving CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Systematic evaluation of immune regulation and modulation.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tor B StugeDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Susan P Holmes
Sahdev Saharan
Andrea Tuettenberg
Mario Roederer
Jeffrey S Weber
Peter P Lee
Stanford University · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Functional And Phenotypic Characterization Of T Cells In ManZ01AI005021 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI ROEDERER, MARIO · 2002 to 2008
$1.5M
Characterization of Tumor Specific T Cells in MelanomaR01CA090809 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, PETER POON-HANG · 2001 to 2005
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 090809NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma patients vaccinated with tumor-associated antigens frequently develop measurable peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses; however, such responses often do not confer clinical benefit. Understanding why vaccine-elicited responses are beneficial in some patients but not in others will be important to improve targeted cancer immunotherapies. METHODS AND

findingsWe analyzed peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses in detail, by generating and characterizing over 200 cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones derived from T cell responses to heteroclitic peptide vaccination, and compared these responses to endogenous anti-tumor T cell responses elicited naturally (a heteroclitic peptide is a modification of a native peptide sequence involving substitution of an amino acid at an anchor residue to enhance the immunogenicity of the peptide). We found that vaccine-elicited T cells are diverse in T cell receptor variable chain beta expression and exhibit a different recognition profile for heteroclitic versus native peptide. In particular, vaccine-elicited T cells respond to native peptide with predominantly low recognition efficiency--a measure of the sensitivity of a T cell to different cognate peptide concentrations for stimulation--and, as a result, are inefficient in tumor lysis. In contrast, endogenous tumor-associated-antigen-specific T cells show a predominantly high recognition efficiency for native peptide and efficiently lyse tumor targets.

conclusionsThese results suggest that factors that shape the peptide-specific T cell repertoire after vaccination may be different from those that affect the endogenous response. Furthermore, our findings suggest that current heteroclitic peptide vaccination protocols drive expansion of peptide-specific T cells with a diverse range of recognition efficiencies, a significant proportion of which are unable to respond to melanoma cells. Therefore, it is critical that the recognition efficiency of vaccine-elicited T cells be measured, with the goal of advancing those modalities that elicit T cells with the greatest potential of tumor reactivity.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAntigens, NeoplasmCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFlow CytometryHumansImmunotherapyMelanomaNeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAntigens, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID15578105
PMCPMC529423
OpenAlexW1977878909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.