Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15576537›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

The unexpected in primary care: a multicenter study on the emergence of unvoiced patient agenda.

Michael Peltenburg, Joachim E Fischer, Ottomar Bahrs, Sandra van Dulmen, Atie van den Brink-Muinen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Narrative Approach to Healing Chronic Illness.Annals of family medicine · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 'I didn't want her to panic': unvoiced patient agendas in primary care consultations when consulting about antidepressants.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Physician response to "by-the-way" syndrome in primary care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael PeltenburgHorten-Zentrum für praxisorientierte, Forschung und Wissenstransfer, Zurich, Switzerland. Michael.Peltenburg@hin.ch
Joachim E Fischer
Ottomar Bahrs
Sandra van Dulmen
Atie van den Brink-Muinen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWithin the time constraints of a typical physician-patient encounter, the full patient agenda will rarely be voiced. Unexpectedly revealed issues that were neither on the patient's list of items for discussion nor anticipated by the physician constitute an emerging agenda. We aimed to quantify the occurrence rate of emerging agendas in primary care practices and to explain the variation between patients and practices.

methodsThis observational cross-sectional study involved 182 primary care practices in 9 European cultural regions. Consecutive primary care consultations were videotaped and rated. Patients completed preconsultation and postconsultation questionnaires assessing their expectations and perceived care. Emerging agenda, determined by using 11-item preconsultation and postconsultation questionnaires, was defined as care perceived by the patient to be in addition to expected care, after adjustment for cultural variations of patient expectations.

resultsFor consultations involving 2,243 patients (mean age, 44.8 years, 58.4% women), every sixth (15.8%) consultation revealed emerging psychosocial agenda. Biomedical agenda emerged in 14.5% of the consultations. Rates for unmet expectations were 13.6% and 10.3%, respectively, for psychosocial and biomedical problems. Practices showed considerable heterogeneity of occurrence of emerging agenda (biomedical, median 13%, range 0%-67%; psychosocial, median 14%, range 0%-53%). After controlling for region and patient baseline characteristics, variables significantly related to emerging agenda were patient expectations and biomedical or psychosocial discourse content, but not consultation time or sex of the patient. A large proportion of the variance attributable to physicians remained concealed in a practice dummy variable (explaining up to 8% of the variance).

conclusionUnexpected agenda emerges in every sixth to seventh consultation in outpatient primary care visits.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareEmergency Medical ServicesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID15576537
PMCPMC1466741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.