Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15572456›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

Genomic data support the hominoid slowdown and an Early Oligocene estimate for the hominoid-cercopithecoid divergence.

Michael E Steiper, Nathan M Young, Tika Y Sukarna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Parting ways: Pan-Homo divergence revisited.Primates; journal of primatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Primitive Old World monkey from the earliest Miocene of Kenya and the evolution of cercopithecoid bilophodonty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evidence for a convergent slowdown in primate molecular rates and its implications for the timing of early primate evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolution of the couple cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase in primates.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2012
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael E SteiperDepartments of Anthropology and Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA. msteiper@hunter.cuny.edu
Nathan M Young
Tika Y Sukarna

Funding

WILD TYPE &MUTANT P53 INTERACTIONS WITH HIV LTR DNAG12RR003037 · NCRR · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI DOTTIN, ROBERT P · 1985 to 2011
$27.6M
NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR003037NCRR NIH HHS RR-03037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several lines of indirect evidence suggest that hominoids (apes and humans) and cercopithecoids (Old World monkeys) diverged around 23-25 Mya. Importantly, although this range of dates has been used as both an initial assumption and as a confirmation of results in many molecular-clock analyses, it has not been critically assessed on its own merits. In this article we test the robusticity of the 23- to 25-Mya estimate with approximately 150,000 base pairs of orthologous DNA sequence data from two cercopithecoids and two hominoids by using quartet analysis. This method is an improvement over other estimates of the hominoid-cercopithecoid divergence because it incorporates two calibration points, one each within cercopithecoids and hominoids, and tests for a statistically appropriate model of molecular evolution. Most comparisons reject rate constancy in favor of a model incorporating two rates of evolution, supporting the "hominoid slowdown" hypothesis. By using this model of molecular evolution, the hominoid-cercopithecoid divergence is estimated to range from 29.2 to 34.5 Mya, significantly older than most previous analyses. Hominoid-cercopithecoid divergence dates of 23-25 Mya fall outside of the confidence intervals estimated, suggesting that as much as one-third of ape evolution has not been paleontologically sampled. Identifying stem cercopithecoids or hominoids from this period will be difficult because derived features that define crown catarrhines need not be present in early members of these lineages. More sites that sample primate habitats from the Oligocene of Africa are needed to better understand early ape and Old World monkey evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticTimeAnimalsBiological EvolutionCercopithecidaeContig MappingHominidaeHumansLikelihood FunctionsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID15572456
PMCPMC535389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.