Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15570425›Full record

ReviewRheumatology international2005

Current knowledge about physiotherapeutic strategies in osteoporosis prevention and treatment.

U Lange, J Teichmann, C Uhlemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology international, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pain Management in Osteoporosis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023
    Article
  3. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

U LangeDepartment of Rheumatology, Kerckhoff Clinic and Foundation, Sprudelhof 11, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany. U.Lange@kerckhoff-klinik.de
J Teichmann
C Uhlemann
City Hospital · GBJena University Hospital · DEKerckhoff Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In treating patients with osteoporosis, one option in physiotherapy is to comply with given physical norms by using physical stimuli to influence biological functions and structures (bone, muscle) for adaptation, stimulation, and regeneration. Serial physical stimuli can also be used for interventions and actions to minimise pain perception by means of biopsychosocial influence. In osteoporosis, physiotherapy has to be rated on a par with pharmacotherapy with respect to prevention, cure, and rehabilitation. Generally, two different aims can be defined: (1) those which can be achieved with physical therapy alone, such as structural improvement of the existing and pharmacologically increased bone tissue, slowing down of round-back formation, and fall prophylaxis and (2) those which can be achieved with physiotherapy and pharmacotherapy, such as effective pain relief and increased bone density. Regulation and normalisation of physical capacities with an aim towards maintenance and economisation of functions and improvement in abilities call for a skillful and case-specific use of physiotherapy.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesExerciseHumansOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID15570425
OpenAlexW2116908028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.