[Shock trauma room management of the multiple-traumatized patient with skull-brain injuries. A systematic review of the literature].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Interruption of the diagnostic algorithm and immediate surgical intervention after major trauma--incidence and clinical relevance. Analysis of the Trauma Register of the German Society for Trauma Surgery].Der Unfallchirurg · 2010
   Article
2. [Surgical management of life-threatening injuries].Der Unfallchirurg · 2009
   Article
3. Polytrauma--pathophysiology and management principles.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2008
   Review
4. [Trauma care management].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2007
   Article
5. [Traumatic brain injury: impact on timing and modality of fracture care].Der Orthopade · 2005
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as