ArticleClinical rheumatology2005
Clinical significance of von Willebrand factor in patients with adult dermatomyositis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neutrophil and mononuclear leukocyte pathways and upstream regulators revealed by serum proteomics of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Article
- Update on Biomarkers of Vasculopathy in Juvenile and Adult Myositis.Current rheumatology reports · 2022Review
- Endothelial Activation Markers as Disease Activity and Damage Measures in Juvenile Dermatomyositis.The Journal of rheumatology · 2020Article
- Biomarkers in Adult Dermatomyositis: Tools to Help the Diagnosis and Predict the Clinical Outcome.Journal of immunology research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because the clinical significance of von Willebrand factor (vWF), a marker of endothelial injury, has not been well studied in adult patients with dermatomyositis (DM), we evaluated whether plasma vWF levels are useful as an index of disease activity in these patients. We measured plasma vWF antigen levels in 11 patients with active adult DM, 13 patients with inactive DM, and 18 healthy subjects using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The association of vWF level with clinical condition and muscle-derived enzyme leakage among DM patients was examined using analysis of covariance and logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, we studied the effects of treatment on the vWF antigen level. The mean vWF antigen level was significantly higher in active DM patients than in inactive DM patients and healthy subjects. Higher vWF levels were associated with clinical symptoms, such as general fatigue, fever, and muscle weakness. They were also associated with the levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and aldolase, but not with those of lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase (CK). vWF antigen was correlated with muscle enzymes except for CK. The plasma vWF levels in six patients with active DM significantly decreased after successful corticosteroid treatment. Plasma vWF level may be considered a useful marker of disease activity in adult DM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.