Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15565357›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2005

Why are physicians so skeptical about positive randomized controlled clinical trials in critical care medicine?

Jesús Villar, Lina Pérez-Méndez, Armando Aguirre-Jaime, Robert M Kacmarek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Redefining ARDS: a paradigm shift.Critical care (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of a clinical trial on mechanical ventilation practices in patients with acute lung injury.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2008
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Activated protein C: do more survive?Intensive care medicine · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jesús VillarResearch Institute, Hospital Universitario N.S. de Candelaria, Carretera del Rosario s/n, Canary Islands, 38010, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. jesus.villar@canarias.org
Lina Pérez-Méndez
Armando Aguirre-Jaime
Robert M Kacmarek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDiffusion of InnovationHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionPhysiciansResearch Design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.