ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2005
Y-STR analysis for detection and objective confirmation of child sexual abuse.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- An integrated system for forensic DNA testing of sexual assault cases in the Philippines.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2021Article
- Taiwan Y-chromosomal DNA variation and its relationship with Island Southeast Asia.BMC genetics · 2014Article
- Isolating DNA from sexual assault cases: a comparison of standard methods with a nuclease-based approach.Investigative genetics · 2012Article
- Y-STR DNA analysis of 154 female child sexual assault cases in the Philippines.International journal of legal medicine · 2011Article
- Laser capture microdissection in the tissue biorepository.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2010Review
- An ultra-high discrimination Y chromosome short tandem repeat multiplex DNA typing system.PloS one · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated 26 child sexual assault cases for the incorporation of Y-STR screening in the routine detection and objective confirmation of sexual contact between the child victim and the perpetrator. Various samples, e.g. vaginal or anal swabs from patients aged 2-17 years old (25 females, 1 male), were collected 6-72 h after the incident. Due to the limited amounts of DNA in these samples, total DNA was extracted using a one-step procedure and screened with autosomal STRs to detect signs of a victim-assailant DNA mixture and with Y-STRs for assailant DNA. Autosomal STRs failed to give signs of victim-assailant DNA mixtures while Y-STRs were detected in 24 of the 26 cases corresponding to a success rate of 92.3%. With the possible presence of both male sperm and/or male epithelial cells in forensic evidence, Y-STR DNA markers were detected regardless of external ejaculation, microscopic detection of sperm and with post-coital intervals of up to 72 h. While only partial profiles were generated owing to low quantities of male DNA present, Y-STR screening results can serve as objective evidence of sexual contact in child sexual abuse cases involving victims who do not have any previous sexual history. This type of evidence can corroborate child victim testimony and spare the child victim from further trauma caused by prolonged forensic investigations and court proceedings. Alternatively, Y-STR screening can provide objective proof of non-involvement of an accused with the victim.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.