Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15563360›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2004

A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK-PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Goonaseelan Pillai, Ronald Gieschke, Timothy Goggin, Philippe Jacqmin, Ralph C Schimmer, Jean-Louis Steimer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Osteoporosis treatment with risedronate: a population pharmacokinetic model for the description of its absorption and low plasma levels.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pharmacology of bisphosphonates.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  16. Pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology for metabolic bone diseases.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Goonaseelan PillaiModelling and Simulation Team, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland. goonaseelan.pillai@pharma.novartis.com
Ronald Gieschke
Timothy Goggin
Philippe Jacqmin
Ralph C Schimmer
Jean-Louis Steimer
Cancer Research And Biostatistics · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHHealthInsight · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIbandronate, a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is the subject of an ongoing clinical development programme that aims to maximize the potential of simplified, less frequent oral and intravenous (i.v.) administration in osteoporosis. A modelling and simulation project was undertaken to characterize further the clinical pharmacology of ibandronate and identify convenient intermittent oral and i.v. regimens for clinical evaluation. METHODS AND

resultsUsing selected data from clinical studies involving 174 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), a classical multicompartmental pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was developed that accurately described the PK of i.v. ibandronate in plasma and urine and urinary excretion of the C-telopeptide of the alpha chain of type I collagen (uCTX), a sensitive biomarker of PD response to ibandronate. To reduce processing times, the classical PK-PD model was simplified using a "kinetics of drug action" or kinetic (K)-PD model (i.e. a dose-response model as opposed to a dose-concentration-response model). The performance of the K-PD model was evaluated by fitting data simulated with the PK-PD model under various dosing regimens. The simplified model produced a virtually indistinguishable fit of the data from that of the PK-PD model. The K-PD model was extended to consider the influence of supplemental therapy (calcium with or without vitamin D) on the PD response and validated by retrospectively simulating the uCTX response in a prior Phase III and Phase II/III study of i.v. ibandronate, given once every 3 months, in 3380 women with PMO. The observed median uCTX responses at the scheduled assessment points in the completed studies were within the distribution of the simulated responses. The K-PD model for i.v. ibandronate was extended further to allow simultaneous fitting of uCTX responses after i.v. and oral administration in 676 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and validated by retrospectively simulating the data observed in a Phase I study of oral daily ibandronate in 180 women with PMO. The K-PD model adequately described the uCTX response after oral dosing.

conclusionsThis validated K-PD model is currently being used to evaluate a range of novel intermittent oral and i.v. ibandronate regimens in an ongoing clinical development programme.

Indexed as

Administration, OralBiomarkersBone ResorptionClinical Trials as TopicCollagenCollagen Type IDiphosphonatesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansIbandronic AcidInfusions, IntravenousModels, BiologicalOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPeptidesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersCollagenCollagen Type Icollagen type I trimeric cross-linked peptideDiphosphonatesIbandronic AcidPeptides

Identifiers

PMID15563360
PMCPMC1884644
OpenAlexW2164933519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.