Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15562929›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2004

Role of N-acetylcysteine in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiovascular procedures: a meta-analysis.

Deepika Misra, Keith Leibowitz, Ramesh M Gowda, Michael Shapiro, Ijaz A Khan

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acute renal failure.BMJ clinical evidence · 2008
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. N-acetylcysteine -- passe-partout or much ado about nothing?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2006
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deepika MisraDivision of Cardiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Keith Leibowitz
Ramesh M Gowda
Michael Shapiro
Ijaz A Khan
Mount Sinai Beth Israel · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrast-induced nephropathy is one of the common causes of acute renal insufficiency after cardiovascular procedures. HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this paper was to analyze the published data on the usefulness of N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after these procedures.

methodsTrials were selected if they were prospective, randomized, controlled, had selected patients with impaired renal function, used low-osmolality, nonionic contrast media intra-arterially, administered a total of four doses of N-acetylcysteine in addition to intravenous saline hydration, and had contrast-induced nephropathy as their primary outcome. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration by >0.5 mg/dl or a 25% increase above baseline at or within 48 h post procedure. Meta-analysis was performed using the Fisher's Combined Test with a measure of effect size. The magnitude of the N-acetylcysteine effect was estimated using random-effects models. Homogeneity was evaluated using the chi-square test of homogeneity and standard Q statistic. Reporting bias was explored by the Rosenthal method.

resultsThe Fisher's Combined Test was significant at p < 0.005 in favor of N-acetylcysteine. The size of the N-acetylcysteine effect was to reduce contrast-induced nephropathy by 20%. There was a 62% relative risk reduction in contrast-induced nephropathy with N-acetylcysteine using a fixed-effects model, and a 70% relative risk reduction using the random-effects model. In addition, we found that 27 unpublished trials showing no effects of N-acetylcysteine would exist to overturn the combined significance of p < 0.005 of the five trials in our meta-analysis.

conclusionOral administration of N-acetylcysteine in addition to intravenous saline hydration has a beneficial effect in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiovascular procedures in patients with impaired renal function.

Indexed as

AcetylcysteineAcute Kidney InjuryAdministration, OralAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CatheterizationCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyHumansAcetylcysteineContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID15562929
PMCPMC6654550
OpenAlexW1518667173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.